A North Sea Perspective on Shipping, Energy and Environment Aspects in MSP (Q4299163): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added qualifier: reason for deprecation (P354): 2016 NUTS 3 statistical territorial entity (Q2576750)) |
(Changed an Item: Deprecated NUTS Before recalculating) |
||
Property / contained in NUTS: Trøndelag / rank | Property / contained in NUTS: Trøndelag / rank | ||
Deprecated rank |
Revision as of 00:04, 27 August 2022
Project Q4299163 in Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Denmark
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A North Sea Perspective on Shipping, Energy and Environment Aspects in MSP |
Project Q4299163 in Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Denmark |
Statements
1,957,170.0 Euro
0 references
4,049,578.0 Euro
0 references
48.33 percent
0 references
1 January 2016
0 references
31 March 2022
0 references
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
0 references
The North Sea is both an environmental asset and a source for value generation for different maritime sectors. Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) is a tool to help balance the often competing user interests as well as environmental protection aims. However, MSP can only be effective, if national Maritime Spatial Plans are coordinated and not contradictory. A lack of MSP coordination leads to spatial inefficiencies, higher costs for maritime industries and compromised environmental objects. NorthSEE launches a sea-basin wide coordination process among MSP authorities in the North Sea Region (NSR). In this context, NorthSEE aims at achieving greater coherence in MSP across the NSR for three transnational topics: environmental aspects, shipping routes and energy infrastructure. Planners compare existing national MSP plans and approaches. In addition, future scenarios are jointly developed by planners and stakeholders in the framework of the “MSP Challenge 2050” simulation. This improved informational basis allows planners to identify current and future synergies and mismatches of national planning solutions and approaches as well as to come to planning solutions for selected sites with incompatibilities. Findings are synthesised in reports and maps. These will inform national MSP processes, whereby increased MSP coherence will be reached. Recommendations on an MSP coordination process in the NSR set the basis for an ongoing transnational MSP dialogue beyond the project’s lifetime. (English)
0 references