Q3672017 (Q3672017): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed label, description and/or aliases in en: Setting new description) |
(Created claim: summary (P836): **Three groups of actors are to be mobilised:** * The population from the administrative cathegory “people of the journey”. * Collecting and sorting metal waste in the recycling chain. * Companies that buy back and recover metal waste. **A phase of approach, awareness raising and mediation.** With regard to the Traveller population, the aim is to raise awareness of the environmental and health damage of their activity as it is now practised...) |
||||||||||||||
| Property / summary | |||||||||||||||
**Three groups of actors are to be mobilised:** * The population from the administrative cathegory “people of the journey”. * Collecting and sorting metal waste in the recycling chain. * Companies that buy back and recover metal waste. **A phase of approach, awareness raising and mediation.** With regard to the Traveller population, the aim is to raise awareness of the environmental and health damage of their activity as it is now practised (soil pollution and health impacts), but also to explain the regulation of the ironwork activity in order to stimulate a participatory dynamic of working with them. It is also a question of understanding what their expectations are and what form(s) could take accompaniment in order to improve their working conditions and incomes, thus overcoming their economic precariousness. Similarly, many reports and testimonies highlight the conflict between collecting and sorting agencies and Travellers. Some landfills have chosen to equip themselves with an expensive safety system to combat theft, others have chosen insertion site programs. An initiative in Nantes Métropole shows that economic partnerships are possible. It is therefore a matter of organising mediation between Travellers and collecting and sorting organisations in the territory of the Grand Clermont in order to build together a future that is more respectful of each other’s work and benefits society as a whole. It is therefore a question of enhancing the know-how of Travellers and finding complementarities of missions within this sector. **A study phase of the official and non-official sector.** This phase involves an end diagnosis of the official and unofficial activity of the recovery and resale chain of end-of-life metals and vehicles in the territory. An organisational analysis and a detailed and reliable economic costing of the activity currently carried out by all actors are essential to ensure that the solution(s) developed are realistic. The difficulty of this analysis is that it affects a very little visible activity on the part of Travellers but also from companies that buy scrap stocks, and not officially quantified. An approach methodology based on listening, dialogue and co-construction will create a climate of trust so that the actors agree to communicate about the organisation of their activity, thus allowing an analysis to be as close as possible to reality. **A co-construction of the future of the recycling industry.** Thanks to the dynamics of action introduced during the upstream phases and described above, AGSGV 63 aims here to define with all the stakeholders concerned the possible economic and legal partnership for the future. Although it is not possible today to say what the specific prospects will be for the current problem of scrapping of Travellers, it seems, however, that taking account of the activity carried out by Travellers requires the promotion and professional and economic recognition of the profession they have been carrying out for generations. It is therefore necessary to define with all the stakeholders the possible and acceptable place for all of the activity that the Travellers concerned could exercise in the regulatory cycle of recycling. **A qualification of the proposed activity offer.** This will describe the offer of activity that Travellers could exercise in the regulatory sector and defined in the above phase. This qualification of the tender requires a quantification of the economic viability of the proposed activity, a quantification of the initial investment allowing the creation of infrastructure to meet standards, a search for land and the possible legal status. The validation of travellers’ skills may also be discussed. The start-up investment required for the activity may represent a significant cost that travellers will not be able to bear on their own. It is therefore likely that public/private investment is necessary. Several legal statutes exist (Société Public Local, Groupement d’Inêt Economique, Société Coopérative d’Inêt Collectif,...) and must therefore be studied in the light of the recommendations defined. **A final phase:** * Presentation of the activity offer developed to all partners in the Grand Clermont territory but also to a wider audience in the context of the capitalisation of experience. * Establishment of the partnership organisation to support entrepreneurs in the implementation of the project developed and validated. It will be a question of identifying and mobilising (English) | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: **Three groups of actors are to be mobilised:** * The population from the administrative cathegory “people of the journey”. * Collecting and sorting metal waste in the recycling chain. * Companies that buy back and recover metal waste. **A phase of approach, awareness raising and mediation.** With regard to the Traveller population, the aim is to raise awareness of the environmental and health damage of their activity as it is now practised (soil pollution and health impacts), but also to explain the regulation of the ironwork activity in order to stimulate a participatory dynamic of working with them. It is also a question of understanding what their expectations are and what form(s) could take accompaniment in order to improve their working conditions and incomes, thus overcoming their economic precariousness. Similarly, many reports and testimonies highlight the conflict between collecting and sorting agencies and Travellers. Some landfills have chosen to equip themselves with an expensive safety system to combat theft, others have chosen insertion site programs. An initiative in Nantes Métropole shows that economic partnerships are possible. It is therefore a matter of organising mediation between Travellers and collecting and sorting organisations in the territory of the Grand Clermont in order to build together a future that is more respectful of each other’s work and benefits society as a whole. It is therefore a question of enhancing the know-how of Travellers and finding complementarities of missions within this sector. **A study phase of the official and non-official sector.** This phase involves an end diagnosis of the official and unofficial activity of the recovery and resale chain of end-of-life metals and vehicles in the territory. An organisational analysis and a detailed and reliable economic costing of the activity currently carried out by all actors are essential to ensure that the solution(s) developed are realistic. The difficulty of this analysis is that it affects a very little visible activity on the part of Travellers but also from companies that buy scrap stocks, and not officially quantified. An approach methodology based on listening, dialogue and co-construction will create a climate of trust so that the actors agree to communicate about the organisation of their activity, thus allowing an analysis to be as close as possible to reality. **A co-construction of the future of the recycling industry.** Thanks to the dynamics of action introduced during the upstream phases and described above, AGSGV 63 aims here to define with all the stakeholders concerned the possible economic and legal partnership for the future. Although it is not possible today to say what the specific prospects will be for the current problem of scrapping of Travellers, it seems, however, that taking account of the activity carried out by Travellers requires the promotion and professional and economic recognition of the profession they have been carrying out for generations. It is therefore necessary to define with all the stakeholders the possible and acceptable place for all of the activity that the Travellers concerned could exercise in the regulatory cycle of recycling. **A qualification of the proposed activity offer.** This will describe the offer of activity that Travellers could exercise in the regulatory sector and defined in the above phase. This qualification of the tender requires a quantification of the economic viability of the proposed activity, a quantification of the initial investment allowing the creation of infrastructure to meet standards, a search for land and the possible legal status. The validation of travellers’ skills may also be discussed. The start-up investment required for the activity may represent a significant cost that travellers will not be able to bear on their own. It is therefore likely that public/private investment is necessary. Several legal statutes exist (Société Public Local, Groupement d’Inêt Economique, Société Coopérative d’Inêt Collectif,...) and must therefore be studied in the light of the recommendations defined. **A final phase:** * Presentation of the activity offer developed to all partners in the Grand Clermont territory but also to a wider audience in the context of the capitalisation of experience. * Establishment of the partnership organisation to support entrepreneurs in the implementation of the project developed and validated. It will be a question of identifying and mobilising (English) / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: **Three groups of actors are to be mobilised:** * The population from the administrative cathegory “people of the journey”. * Collecting and sorting metal waste in the recycling chain. * Companies that buy back and recover metal waste. **A phase of approach, awareness raising and mediation.** With regard to the Traveller population, the aim is to raise awareness of the environmental and health damage of their activity as it is now practised (soil pollution and health impacts), but also to explain the regulation of the ironwork activity in order to stimulate a participatory dynamic of working with them. It is also a question of understanding what their expectations are and what form(s) could take accompaniment in order to improve their working conditions and incomes, thus overcoming their economic precariousness. Similarly, many reports and testimonies highlight the conflict between collecting and sorting agencies and Travellers. Some landfills have chosen to equip themselves with an expensive safety system to combat theft, others have chosen insertion site programs. An initiative in Nantes Métropole shows that economic partnerships are possible. It is therefore a matter of organising mediation between Travellers and collecting and sorting organisations in the territory of the Grand Clermont in order to build together a future that is more respectful of each other’s work and benefits society as a whole. It is therefore a question of enhancing the know-how of Travellers and finding complementarities of missions within this sector. **A study phase of the official and non-official sector.** This phase involves an end diagnosis of the official and unofficial activity of the recovery and resale chain of end-of-life metals and vehicles in the territory. An organisational analysis and a detailed and reliable economic costing of the activity currently carried out by all actors are essential to ensure that the solution(s) developed are realistic. The difficulty of this analysis is that it affects a very little visible activity on the part of Travellers but also from companies that buy scrap stocks, and not officially quantified. An approach methodology based on listening, dialogue and co-construction will create a climate of trust so that the actors agree to communicate about the organisation of their activity, thus allowing an analysis to be as close as possible to reality. **A co-construction of the future of the recycling industry.** Thanks to the dynamics of action introduced during the upstream phases and described above, AGSGV 63 aims here to define with all the stakeholders concerned the possible economic and legal partnership for the future. Although it is not possible today to say what the specific prospects will be for the current problem of scrapping of Travellers, it seems, however, that taking account of the activity carried out by Travellers requires the promotion and professional and economic recognition of the profession they have been carrying out for generations. It is therefore necessary to define with all the stakeholders the possible and acceptable place for all of the activity that the Travellers concerned could exercise in the regulatory cycle of recycling. **A qualification of the proposed activity offer.** This will describe the offer of activity that Travellers could exercise in the regulatory sector and defined in the above phase. This qualification of the tender requires a quantification of the economic viability of the proposed activity, a quantification of the initial investment allowing the creation of infrastructure to meet standards, a search for land and the possible legal status. The validation of travellers’ skills may also be discussed. The start-up investment required for the activity may represent a significant cost that travellers will not be able to bear on their own. It is therefore likely that public/private investment is necessary. Several legal statutes exist (Société Public Local, Groupement d’Inêt Economique, Société Coopérative d’Inêt Collectif,...) and must therefore be studied in the light of the recommendations defined. **A final phase:** * Presentation of the activity offer developed to all partners in the Grand Clermont territory but also to a wider audience in the context of the capitalisation of experience. * Establishment of the partnership organisation to support entrepreneurs in the implementation of the project developed and validated. It will be a question of identifying and mobilising (English) / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
point in time: 18 November 2021
| |||||||||||||||
Revision as of 10:05, 18 November 2021
Project Q3672017 in France
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No label defined |
Project Q3672017 in France |
Statements
117,974.64 Euro
0 references
196,624.4 Euro
0 references
60.00 percent
0 references
1 September 2015
0 references
30 April 2018
0 references
Association de Gestion du Schéma départemental d'accueil et d'habitat des Gens du Voyage
0 references
**Trois groupes d’acteurs sont à mobiliser :** * La population issue de la cathégorie administrative "gens du voyage". * Les organismes de collecte et de tri des déchets de métaux de la filière du recyclage. * Les entreprises qui rachètent et valorisent les déchets de métaux. **Une phase d’approche, de sensibilisation et de médiation.** Concernant la population des gens du voyage, il s’agit de faire prendre conscience des dommages environnementaux et sanitaires de leur activité telle qu’elle est aujourd’hui pratiquée (pollution des sols et impacts sur la santé), mais également d’expliquer la règlementation de l’activité de ferraillage afin d’impulser une dynamique participative de travail avec eux. Il s’agit également de comprendre quelles sont leurs attente et quelle(s) forme(s) pourrait prendre un accompagnement afin d’améliorer leur conditions de travail et leurs revenus, et ainsi sortir de la précarité économique qui est la leur. De même, nombres de comptes rendu, de témoignages, soulignent le conflit existant entre les organismes de collecte et de tri et les gens du voyage. Certaines déchetteries ont fait le choix de s’équiper d’un système de sécurité coûteux afin de lutter contre le vol, d’autres ont fait le choix de programmes de chantiers d’insertion. Une initiative à Nantes Métropole montre que des partenariats économiques sont possibles. Il s’agit donc d’organiser la médiation entre les gens du voyage et les organismes de collecte et de tri sur le territoire du Grand Clermont afin de construire ensemble un avenir plus respectueux du travail des uns et des autres et profitable à l’ensemble de la société. Il s’agit donc de valoriser les savoir-faire des gens du voyage et trouver des complémentarités de missions au sein de cette filière. **Une phase d’étude de la filière officielle et non officielle.** Il s’agit durant cette phase d’établir un diagnostic fin de l’activité officielle et non officielle de la chaîne de récupération et de revente des métaux et des véhicules hors d’usage sur le territoire. Une analyse organisationnelle et un chiffrage économique détaillé et fiable de l’activité exercée à l’heure actuelle par l’ensemble des acteurs sont primordiaux afin que la ou les solutions élaborées soient réalistes. La difficulté de cette analyse est qu’elle touche une activité très peu visible de la part des gens du voyage mais également des entreprises qui achètent les stocks de ferraille, et non officiellement quantifiée. Une méthodologie d’approche basée sur l’écoute, le dialogue et la co-construction permettra d’instaurer un climat de confiance afin que les acteurs acceptent de communiquer sur l’organisation de leur activité, permettant ainsi une analyse au plus près de la réalité. **Une co-construction de l’avenir de la filière du recyclage.** Grâce à la dynamique d’action instaurée pendant les phases amonts et décrite ci-dessus, l’AGSGV 63 aspire ici à définir avec l’ensemble des acteurs concernés le partenariat économique et juridique envisageable pour l’avenir. Même s’il n’est pas possible aujourd’hui de dire quelles seront les perspectives précises au problème actuel de l’activité de ferraillage des gens du voyage, il semble cependant que la prise en compte de l’activité exercée par ces derniers passe par une valorisation et une reconnaissance professionnelle et économique du métier qu’ils exercent depuis des générations. Il s’agit donc de définir avec l’ensemble des acteurs la place possible et acceptable par tous de l’activité que pourraient exercer les gens du voyage concernés, dans la filière réglementaire du recyclage. **Une qualification de l’offre d’activité envisagée.** Il s’agira ici de qualifier l’offre d’activité que pourrait exercer les gens du voyage dans la filière réglementaire et définit dans la phase ci-dessus. Cette qualification de l’offre passe par un chiffrage de la viabilité économique de l’activité envisagée, un chiffrage de l’investissement de départ permettant la création d’infrastructures aux normes, une recherche de foncier et le statut juridique possible. Il pourra également être question de la validation des compétences des voyageurs. L’investissement de départ nécessaire à l’activité peut représenter un coût important que les voyageurs ne seront pas à même de supporter seuls. Il est donc probable qu’un investissement public/privé soit nécessaire. Plusieurs statuts juridiques existent (Société Public Local, Groupement d’Intérêt Economique, Société Coopérative d’Intérêt Collectif,…) et doivent donc être étudiés au regard des préconisations définies. **Une phase finale :** * Présentation de l’offre d’activité élaborée à l’ensemble des partenaires du territoire du Grand Clermont mais également à un public plus large dans le cadre de la capitalisation d’expérience. * Mise en place de l’organisation partenariale pour l’accompagnement des entrepreneurs pour la concrétisation du projet élaboré et validé. Il s’agira ici d’identifier et de mobilis (French)
0 references
**Three groups of actors are to be mobilised:** * The population from the administrative cathegory “people of the journey”. * Collecting and sorting metal waste in the recycling chain. * Companies that buy back and recover metal waste. **A phase of approach, awareness raising and mediation.** With regard to the Traveller population, the aim is to raise awareness of the environmental and health damage of their activity as it is now practised (soil pollution and health impacts), but also to explain the regulation of the ironwork activity in order to stimulate a participatory dynamic of working with them. It is also a question of understanding what their expectations are and what form(s) could take accompaniment in order to improve their working conditions and incomes, thus overcoming their economic precariousness. Similarly, many reports and testimonies highlight the conflict between collecting and sorting agencies and Travellers. Some landfills have chosen to equip themselves with an expensive safety system to combat theft, others have chosen insertion site programs. An initiative in Nantes Métropole shows that economic partnerships are possible. It is therefore a matter of organising mediation between Travellers and collecting and sorting organisations in the territory of the Grand Clermont in order to build together a future that is more respectful of each other’s work and benefits society as a whole. It is therefore a question of enhancing the know-how of Travellers and finding complementarities of missions within this sector. **A study phase of the official and non-official sector.** This phase involves an end diagnosis of the official and unofficial activity of the recovery and resale chain of end-of-life metals and vehicles in the territory. An organisational analysis and a detailed and reliable economic costing of the activity currently carried out by all actors are essential to ensure that the solution(s) developed are realistic. The difficulty of this analysis is that it affects a very little visible activity on the part of Travellers but also from companies that buy scrap stocks, and not officially quantified. An approach methodology based on listening, dialogue and co-construction will create a climate of trust so that the actors agree to communicate about the organisation of their activity, thus allowing an analysis to be as close as possible to reality. **A co-construction of the future of the recycling industry.** Thanks to the dynamics of action introduced during the upstream phases and described above, AGSGV 63 aims here to define with all the stakeholders concerned the possible economic and legal partnership for the future. Although it is not possible today to say what the specific prospects will be for the current problem of scrapping of Travellers, it seems, however, that taking account of the activity carried out by Travellers requires the promotion and professional and economic recognition of the profession they have been carrying out for generations. It is therefore necessary to define with all the stakeholders the possible and acceptable place for all of the activity that the Travellers concerned could exercise in the regulatory cycle of recycling. **A qualification of the proposed activity offer.** This will describe the offer of activity that Travellers could exercise in the regulatory sector and defined in the above phase. This qualification of the tender requires a quantification of the economic viability of the proposed activity, a quantification of the initial investment allowing the creation of infrastructure to meet standards, a search for land and the possible legal status. The validation of travellers’ skills may also be discussed. The start-up investment required for the activity may represent a significant cost that travellers will not be able to bear on their own. It is therefore likely that public/private investment is necessary. Several legal statutes exist (Société Public Local, Groupement d’Inêt Economique, Société Coopérative d’Inêt Collectif,...) and must therefore be studied in the light of the recommendations defined. **A final phase:** * Presentation of the activity offer developed to all partners in the Grand Clermont territory but also to a wider audience in the context of the capitalisation of experience. * Establishment of the partnership organisation to support entrepreneurs in the implementation of the project developed and validated. It will be a question of identifying and mobilising (English)
18 November 2021
0 references
Identifiers
201502380
0 references