(7429.31052017.113000220_1667) SMARTISS (Q2166722)

From EU Knowledge Graph
Revision as of 01:48, 17 July 2020 by DG Regio (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Project in Italy financed by DG Regio
Language Label Description Also known as
English
(7429.31052017.113000220_1667) SMARTISS
Project in Italy financed by DG Regio

    Statements

    0 references
    30,000.0 Euro
    0 references
    120,000.0 Euro
    0 references
    25.0 percent
    0 references
    25 September 2017
    0 references
    31 October 2019
    0 references
    18 January 2020
    0 references
    UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI FIRENZE
    0 references
    0 references

    43°46'11.53"N, 11°15'20.09"E
    0 references
    L?IDEA BASE DEL PROGETTO ? QUELLA DI RESTITUIRE VALIDIT? TECNICA ED ECONOMICA AL SISTEMA STRUTTURALE TIPICO DEL MAGAZZINO AUTOPORTANTE LA CUI PROGETTAZIONE ? DIVENUTA MOLTO PROBLEMATICA SIA NEI CONFRONTI DEL DIMENSIONAMENTO ANTISISMICO, SIA NEI CONFRONTI DELLE VERIFICHE INERENTI IL CONTROLLO DELLE MODALIT? DI COLLASSO IN OCCASIONE DI UNO SCENARIO D?INCENDIO. IN PARTICOLARE RISULTA DIFFICILE FAR COESISTERE I PRINCIPI ALLA BASE DELLA RECENTE PROGETTAZIONE ANTISISMICA DENOMINATA ?CAPACITY DESIGN? (DUTTILIT? E FLESSIBILIT? DELLE STRUTTURE) CON QUELLI ALLA BASE DELLA COSIDDETTA ?FIRE ENGINEERING? (AUMENTO DEGLI SPESSORI E DELLA RIGIDEZZA STRUTTURALE). IN QUESTO GI? COMPLESSO SCENARIO DI PROGETTO SI DEVONO AGGIUNGERE I REQUISITI DI ROBUSTEZZA (AD ESEMPIO NEI CONFRONTI DEGLI URTI SULLE STRUTTURE GENERATI DAI MEZZI DI MOVIMENTAZIONE INTERNA) E DI DURABILIT? (ASPETTO CORRELATO ALL?ISPEZIONE AD ALLA MANUTENZIONE DELLE STRUTTURE, AZIONI SPESSO NON SEMPLICI VISTA LA GEOMETRIA E SOPRATTUTTO L?ALT (Italian)
    0 references
    THE BASIC IDEA OF THE PROJECT? WHAT TO RETURN VALIDIT? TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC TO THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM TYPICAL OF A SELF-SUPPORTING WAREHOUSE THE DESIGN OF WHICH? WHICH HAS BECOME VERY PROBLEMATIC BOTH WITH REGARD TO EARTHQUAKE SIZING AND THE CHECKS INHERENT IN THE CONTROLS ON THE CONDITIONS FOR IT? A COLLAPSE IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE SCENARIO. IN PARTICULAR, DO YOU FIND IT DIFFICULT TO CO-EXIST WITH THE PRINCIPLES BEHIND THE RECENT ANTI-SEISMIC DESIGN? (DUTOPT? AND FLESISITILIT? STRUCTURES) WITH THOSE AT THE BASE OF THE SO-CALLED FIRE ENGINEERING? (STRUCTURAL THICKNESS AND THICKNESS). IN THIS GI? COMPLEX PROJECT SCENARIO HAVE TO ADD ROBUSTNESS REQUIREMENTS (E.G. IMPACT ON THE IMPACT ON FACILITIES GENERATED BY THE INTERNAL MOVING VEHICLES) AND DURIN? (RELATED TO? INSPECTION OF THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STRUCTURES, ACTIONS THAT ARE OFTEN NOT SIMPLE IN VIEW OF THE GEOMETRY AND ESPECIALLY THE? ALT (English)
    0 references

    Identifiers