Technical feasibility study on feasibility assessment and analysis of flexible and rigid geo-networks in composite structures (Q3782588): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed an Item: import item from Lithuania) |
(Changed an Item: Adding English translations) |
||||||||||||||
| Property / summary | |||||||||||||||
In Lithuania, practically all geotechnical structures that need to be strengthened (reinforced) by geogrids are strengthened by rigid geogrids. Rigid geonets have good strength properties when geotechnical structures allow large displacements. In the case of small displacements, rigid geonets do not retain a reinforcing function until the deformation reaches 2 % or more. For this reason, an alternative to rigid geonets is chosen, which has good reinforcing properties even with small deformations. A technical feasibility study shall be carried out with an overview of the characteristics of rigid and flexible geogrids with minor deformations, i.e. up to 2 %. (English) | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: In Lithuania, practically all geotechnical structures that need to be strengthened (reinforced) by geogrids are strengthened by rigid geogrids. Rigid geonets have good strength properties when geotechnical structures allow large displacements. In the case of small displacements, rigid geonets do not retain a reinforcing function until the deformation reaches 2 % or more. For this reason, an alternative to rigid geonets is chosen, which has good reinforcing properties even with small deformations. A technical feasibility study shall be carried out with an overview of the characteristics of rigid and flexible geogrids with minor deformations, i.e. up to 2 %. (English) / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: In Lithuania, practically all geotechnical structures that need to be strengthened (reinforced) by geogrids are strengthened by rigid geogrids. Rigid geonets have good strength properties when geotechnical structures allow large displacements. In the case of small displacements, rigid geonets do not retain a reinforcing function until the deformation reaches 2 % or more. For this reason, an alternative to rigid geonets is chosen, which has good reinforcing properties even with small deformations. A technical feasibility study shall be carried out with an overview of the characteristics of rigid and flexible geogrids with minor deformations, i.e. up to 2 %. (English) / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
point in time: 1 February 2022
| |||||||||||||||
Revision as of 13:13, 1 February 2022
Project Q3782588 in Lithuania
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Technical feasibility study on feasibility assessment and analysis of flexible and rigid geo-networks in composite structures |
Project Q3782588 in Lithuania |
Statements
3,287.2 Euro
0 references
4,696.0 Euro
0 references
70.0 percent
0 references
17 July 2017
0 references
17 November 2017
0 references
UAB "Tiekimo sprendimai"
0 references
14013
0 references
Lietuvoje praktiškai visose geotechninėse konstrukcijose, kurios turi būti stiprinamos (armuojamos) geotinklais yra stiprinamos standžiais geotinklais. Standūs geotinklai pasižymi geromis stipruminėmis savybėmis kai geotechninėse konstrukcijose leidžimai dideli poslinkiai. Esant mažiems poslinkiams standūs geotinklai netalieka armuojančios funkcijos, kol deformacijos nepasiekia 2 % ar daugiau. Dėl šios priežasties yra pasirinkta standžių geotinklų alternatyva, kuri pasižymi geromis armuojančiomis savybėmis net ir prie mažų deformacijų. Techninė galimybių studija atliekama apžvelgiant standžių ir lanksčių geotinklų savybes esant mažoms deformacijoms, t. y. iki 2 %. (Lithuanian)
0 references
In Lithuania, practically all geotechnical structures that need to be strengthened (reinforced) by geogrids are strengthened by rigid geogrids. Rigid geonets have good strength properties when geotechnical structures allow large displacements. In the case of small displacements, rigid geonets do not retain a reinforcing function until the deformation reaches 2 % or more. For this reason, an alternative to rigid geonets is chosen, which has good reinforcing properties even with small deformations. A technical feasibility study shall be carried out with an overview of the characteristics of rigid and flexible geogrids with minor deformations, i.e. up to 2 %. (English)
1 February 2022
0 references
Senasis Ukmergės kelias, Užubalių k. 4, Vilniaus raj.
0 references
Identifiers
01.2.1-MITA-K-824-01-0074
0 references