Q3193476 (Q3193476): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed an Item: Edited by the materialized bot - inferring region from the coordinates) |
(Created claim: summary (P836): THE PROJECT STARTS FROM THE HYPOTHESIS THAT MANY OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN REMEMBERING INFORMATION ARE DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND DISTRACTION FROM BOTH THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND INTERNAL THOUGHTS AND MEMORIES, SO THE BRAIN MUST HAVE MECHANISMS TO CONTROL THIS INTERFERENCE. OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT THIS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDES REACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT ACT TO INHIBIT IRRELEVANT INFORMATION THAT INTERFERES, BUT THAT THERE ARE ALSO PROACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT TR...) |
||||||||||||||
| Property / summary | |||||||||||||||
THE PROJECT STARTS FROM THE HYPOTHESIS THAT MANY OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN REMEMBERING INFORMATION ARE DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND DISTRACTION FROM BOTH THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND INTERNAL THOUGHTS AND MEMORIES, SO THE BRAIN MUST HAVE MECHANISMS TO CONTROL THIS INTERFERENCE. OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT THIS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDES REACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT ACT TO INHIBIT IRRELEVANT INFORMATION THAT INTERFERES, BUT THAT THERE ARE ALSO PROACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT TRY TO REDUCE INTERFERENCE BY MONITORING AND MAINTAINING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE TASK. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DUAL CONTROL THEORY OF BRAVER ET AL. (BRAVER ET AL., 2009; BRAVER, 2012). OUR GENERAL OBJECTIVE IS TO SHOW THAT THESE TYPES OF CONTROL INTERACT DYNAMICALLY TO MANAGE MEMORY INFORMATION AND THAT THIS INTERACTION CAN VARY DEPENDING ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE AND THE SITUATION. OUR GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY COGNITIVE CONTROL PROFILES AND THE NEURAL BASES THAT SUPPORT THEM, TO STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL IN RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY SITUATIONS. FINALLY, WE WILL STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING CHANGES IN THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL THROUGH TRAINING AND NEURO-MODULATION. (English) | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: THE PROJECT STARTS FROM THE HYPOTHESIS THAT MANY OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN REMEMBERING INFORMATION ARE DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND DISTRACTION FROM BOTH THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND INTERNAL THOUGHTS AND MEMORIES, SO THE BRAIN MUST HAVE MECHANISMS TO CONTROL THIS INTERFERENCE. OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT THIS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDES REACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT ACT TO INHIBIT IRRELEVANT INFORMATION THAT INTERFERES, BUT THAT THERE ARE ALSO PROACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT TRY TO REDUCE INTERFERENCE BY MONITORING AND MAINTAINING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE TASK. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DUAL CONTROL THEORY OF BRAVER ET AL. (BRAVER ET AL., 2009; BRAVER, 2012). OUR GENERAL OBJECTIVE IS TO SHOW THAT THESE TYPES OF CONTROL INTERACT DYNAMICALLY TO MANAGE MEMORY INFORMATION AND THAT THIS INTERACTION CAN VARY DEPENDING ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE AND THE SITUATION. OUR GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY COGNITIVE CONTROL PROFILES AND THE NEURAL BASES THAT SUPPORT THEM, TO STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL IN RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY SITUATIONS. FINALLY, WE WILL STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING CHANGES IN THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL THROUGH TRAINING AND NEURO-MODULATION. (English) / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: THE PROJECT STARTS FROM THE HYPOTHESIS THAT MANY OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN REMEMBERING INFORMATION ARE DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND DISTRACTION FROM BOTH THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND INTERNAL THOUGHTS AND MEMORIES, SO THE BRAIN MUST HAVE MECHANISMS TO CONTROL THIS INTERFERENCE. OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT THIS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDES REACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT ACT TO INHIBIT IRRELEVANT INFORMATION THAT INTERFERES, BUT THAT THERE ARE ALSO PROACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT TRY TO REDUCE INTERFERENCE BY MONITORING AND MAINTAINING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE TASK. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DUAL CONTROL THEORY OF BRAVER ET AL. (BRAVER ET AL., 2009; BRAVER, 2012). OUR GENERAL OBJECTIVE IS TO SHOW THAT THESE TYPES OF CONTROL INTERACT DYNAMICALLY TO MANAGE MEMORY INFORMATION AND THAT THIS INTERACTION CAN VARY DEPENDING ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE AND THE SITUATION. OUR GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY COGNITIVE CONTROL PROFILES AND THE NEURAL BASES THAT SUPPORT THEM, TO STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL IN RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY SITUATIONS. FINALLY, WE WILL STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING CHANGES IN THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL THROUGH TRAINING AND NEURO-MODULATION. (English) / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
point in time: 13 October 2021
| |||||||||||||||
Revision as of 23:10, 12 October 2021
Project Q3193476 in Spain
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No label defined |
Project Q3193476 in Spain |
Statements
11,616.0 Euro
0 references
14,520.0 Euro
0 references
80.0 percent
0 references
1 January 2016
0 references
30 September 2019
0 references
UNIVERSIDAD DE JAEN
0 references
37°57'20.63"N, 3°29'31.42"W
0 references
23050
0 references
EL PROYECTO PARTE DE LA HIPOTESIS DE QUE MUCHAS DE LAS DIFICULTADES A LA HORA DE RECORDAR INFORMACION SE DEBE A LA INTERFERENCIA Y DISTRACCION TANTO DEL CONTEXTO EXTERNO COMO DE PENSAMIENTOS Y RECUERDOS INTERNOS, POR LO QUE EL CEREBRO HA DE DISPONER DE MECANISMOS PARA CONTROLAR ESA INTERFERENCIA. NUESTRA PROPUESTA ES QUE ESTE SISTEMA DE CONTROL INCLUYE MECANISMOS REACTIVOS QUE ACTUAN PARA INHIBIR LA INFORMACION IRRELEVANTE QUE INTERFIERE, PERO QUE TAMBIEN EXISTEN MECANISMOS PROACTIVOS QUE INTENTAN REDUCIR LA INTERFERENCIA MEDIANTE LA MONITORIZACION Y MANTENIMIENTO DE INFORMACION RELEVANTE PARA LA TAREA. ESTA PROPUESTA ES CONSISTENTE CON LA TEORIA DE CONTROL DUAL DE BRAVER Y COLABORADORES (BRAVER ET AL., 2009; BRAVER, 2012). NUESTRO OBJETIVO GENERAL ES MOSTRAR QUE ESTOS TIPOS DE CONTROL INTERACCIONAN DE FORMA DINAMICA PARA GESTIONAR LA INFORMACION DE LA MEMORIA Y QUE ESTA INTERACCION PUEDE VARIAR DEPENDIENDO DE LAS CARACTERISTICAS DE LAS PERSONAS Y DE LA SITUACION. NUESTRO OBJETIVO ES IDENTIFICAR PERFILES DE CONTROL COGNITIVO Y LAS BASES NEURALES QUE LOS SUSTENTAN, PARA ESTUDIAR DESPUES LA EFICIENCIA DE ESTOS DOS MODOS DE CONTROL EN SITUACIONES DE RECUERDO RETROSPECTIVO Y PROSPECTIVO. FINALMENTE, ESTUDIAREMOS LA POSIBILIDAD DE PRODUCIR CAMBIOS EN LA EFICIENCIA DE ESTAS DOS MODALIDADES DE CONTROL MEDIANTE EL ENTRENAMIENTO Y LA NEURO-MODULACION. (Spanish)
0 references
THE PROJECT STARTS FROM THE HYPOTHESIS THAT MANY OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN REMEMBERING INFORMATION ARE DUE TO INTERFERENCE AND DISTRACTION FROM BOTH THE EXTERNAL CONTEXT AND INTERNAL THOUGHTS AND MEMORIES, SO THE BRAIN MUST HAVE MECHANISMS TO CONTROL THIS INTERFERENCE. OUR PROPOSAL IS THAT THIS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDES REACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT ACT TO INHIBIT IRRELEVANT INFORMATION THAT INTERFERES, BUT THAT THERE ARE ALSO PROACTIVE MECHANISMS THAT TRY TO REDUCE INTERFERENCE BY MONITORING AND MAINTAINING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE TASK. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DUAL CONTROL THEORY OF BRAVER ET AL. (BRAVER ET AL., 2009; BRAVER, 2012). OUR GENERAL OBJECTIVE IS TO SHOW THAT THESE TYPES OF CONTROL INTERACT DYNAMICALLY TO MANAGE MEMORY INFORMATION AND THAT THIS INTERACTION CAN VARY DEPENDING ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PEOPLE AND THE SITUATION. OUR GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY COGNITIVE CONTROL PROFILES AND THE NEURAL BASES THAT SUPPORT THEM, TO STUDY THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL IN RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY SITUATIONS. FINALLY, WE WILL STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF PRODUCING CHANGES IN THE EFFICIENCY OF THESE TWO MODES OF CONTROL THROUGH TRAINING AND NEURO-MODULATION. (English)
13 October 2021
0 references
Jaén
0 references
Identifiers
PSI2015-65502-C2-2-P
0 references