Q3252172 (Q3252172): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Changed label, description and/or aliases in en) |
(Changed an Item: Edited by the infer coords bot - inferring coordinates from location) |
||||||||||
| Property / coordinate location | |||||||||||
40°4'27.91"N, 0°12'49.90"W
| |||||||||||
| Property / coordinate location: 40°4'27.91"N, 0°12'49.90"W / rank | |||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||
Revision as of 23:19, 10 October 2021
Project Q3252172 in Spain
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No label defined |
Project Q3252172 in Spain |
Statements
3,750.0 Euro
0 references
7,500.0 Euro
0 references
50.0 percent
0 references
1 January 2018
0 references
31 December 2018
0 references
ADITIVOS CERAMICOS, S.L.
0 references
40°4'27.91"N, 0°12'49.90"W
0 references
12005
0 references
Se pretende ofrecer al cliente una alternativa a los ligantes tradicionales para polvo atomizado basados en PVA. Estos ligantes tradicionales se han usado desde hace décadas para dar resistencia en verde a las piezas formadas mediante prensado isostático. No obstante, presentan una serie de inconvenientes. - Hay que preparar una disolución mediante calentamiento. Es un proceso lento, costoso y presenta cierta peligrosidad y problemática medioambiental - La disolución ligante se degrada con facilidad y requiere el uso de biocidas. - A dosis elevadas presenta problemas desgasificación que conllevan una pérdida de calidad - Este tipo de ligantes no aportan resistencia mecánica en segunda cocción - Generan muchos residuos - La reología de la barbotina se ve afectada por la adición de estos ligantes y se requieren grandes cantidades de defloculantes con el sobrecoste que supone. En reciclado de material crudo de retorno este problema es más relevante. Con el uso de CERAMBINDER como altern (Spanish)
0 references
It aims to offer customers an alternative to traditional binders for PVA-based atomized powder. These traditional binders have been used for decades to provide green strength to the formed pieces by isostatic pressing. However, they have a number of drawbacks. - should be prepared by heating a solution. It is a slow, costly and presents certain hazards and environmental problems - The binder solution degrades easily and requires the use of biocides. - At high doses presents problems degassing involving a loss in quality - This type of binders do not provide mechanical strength in the second cooking - generate a lot of waste - The rheology of the slurry is affected by the addition of these binders and large amounts are required deflocculants with the additional costs. Recycled raw material return this problem is more relevant. Using CERAMBINDER as an alternative to traditional binding a number of improvements including presented: - No solution to prepare beforehand. simpler and easier p (English)
0 references
Alcora, l'
0 references
Identifiers
20F01020101U_IVCI00000APEA8070
0 references