Q2686235 (Q2686235): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removed claims) Tag: Replaced |
(Changed an Item) |
||||||||||||||
| Property / financed by | |||||||||||||||
| Property / financed by: European Union / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / intervention field | |||||||||||||||
| Property / intervention field: Protection, development and promotion of public cultural and heritage assets / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / country | |||||||||||||||
| Property / country: Poland / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / EU contribution | |||||||||||||||
246,313.68 zloty
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / EU contribution: 246,313.68 zloty / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / EU contribution | |||||||||||||||
54,766.8 Euro
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / EU contribution: 54,766.8 Euro / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / EU contribution: 54,766.8 Euro / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
exchange rate to Euro: 0.2223 Euro
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / budget | |||||||||||||||
273,681.87 zloty
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / budget: 273,681.87 zloty / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / budget | |||||||||||||||
60,852.0 Euro
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / budget: 60,852.0 Euro / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / budget: 60,852.0 Euro / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
exchange rate to Euro: 0.2223 Euro
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / co-financing rate | |||||||||||||||
90.0 percent
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / co-financing rate: 90.0 percent / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / start time | |||||||||||||||
1 January 2020
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / start time: 1 January 2020 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / end time | |||||||||||||||
30 June 2021
| |||||||||||||||
| Property / end time: 30 June 2021 / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / beneficiary name (string) | |||||||||||||||
KATOLICKI UNIWERSYTET LUBELSKI JANA PAWŁA II | |||||||||||||||
| Property / beneficiary name (string): KATOLICKI UNIWERSYTET LUBELSKI JANA PAWŁA II / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / beneficiary | |||||||||||||||
| Property / beneficiary: John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary | |||||||||||||||
a case of social exclusion of persons with disabilities and is in conflict with Article 30 of UN Convention. Modern technology offers now a possibility to reduce the gap in accessibility of visual art to persons with blindness or low vision. The range of exhibits which are accessible needs no longer to be limited to sculpture. Paintings as well as objects which are too small (e.g. jewelry) or to large (e.g. buildings) to explore manually can be presented in a range of formats which totally blind persons can access – tactile graphics, “talking” tactile drawings and diagrams, 3-D models and audio-description. Samples of adaptations of exhibits which can be manually explored at 4 museums in Lublin receive highly positive feedback not only from persons with a visual impairment but also from sighted visitors who find tactile versions of paintings and 3-D models interesting (and educational at the same time). The micro project offers a chance not only to expand the range of adapter exhibits in Lublin but also to introduce the idea in Ivan-Frankivsk museums which have no provisions for persons with a visual impairment. Lublin (Poland) and Ivano-Frankivsk (Ukraine) are united by a twin city agreement. Relatively close distance and frequent coach service make travel between the cities easy. By addressing the challenge of increasing accessibility of cultural heritage to persons with a visual impairment the project will increase the potential of both cities as a tourists’ attraction and will make a major contribution to inclusion of persons with a disability of sight. The fact that neither Lublin nor Ivan-Frankivsk are the first choice as tourist destinations is in fact an advantage. With a mixture of Polish, Ukrainian and Jewish heritage. (English) | |||||||||||||||
| Property / summary: a case of social exclusion of persons with disabilities and is in conflict with Article 30 of UN Convention. Modern technology offers now a possibility to reduce the gap in accessibility of visual art to persons with blindness or low vision. The range of exhibits which are accessible needs no longer to be limited to sculpture. Paintings as well as objects which are too small (e.g. jewelry) or to large (e.g. buildings) to explore manually can be presented in a range of formats which totally blind persons can access – tactile graphics, “talking” tactile drawings and diagrams, 3-D models and audio-description. Samples of adaptations of exhibits which can be manually explored at 4 museums in Lublin receive highly positive feedback not only from persons with a visual impairment but also from sighted visitors who find tactile versions of paintings and 3-D models interesting (and educational at the same time). The micro project offers a chance not only to expand the range of adapter exhibits in Lublin but also to introduce the idea in Ivan-Frankivsk museums which have no provisions for persons with a visual impairment. Lublin (Poland) and Ivano-Frankivsk (Ukraine) are united by a twin city agreement. Relatively close distance and frequent coach service make travel between the cities easy. By addressing the challenge of increasing accessibility of cultural heritage to persons with a visual impairment the project will increase the potential of both cities as a tourists’ attraction and will make a major contribution to inclusion of persons with a disability of sight. The fact that neither Lublin nor Ivan-Frankivsk are the first choice as tourist destinations is in fact an advantage. With a mixture of Polish, Ukrainian and Jewish heritage. (English) / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / fund | |||||||||||||||
| Property / fund: European Regional Development Fund / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
Revision as of 18:06, 20 May 2021
Project Q2686235 in Poland
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No label defined |
Project Q2686235 in Poland |
Statements
246,313.68 zloty
0 references
273,681.87 zloty
0 references
90.0 percent
0 references
1 January 2020
0 references
30 June 2021
0 references
KATOLICKI UNIWERSYTET LUBELSKI JANA PAWŁA II
0 references
a case of social exclusion of persons with disabilities and is in conflict with Article 30 of UN Convention. Modern technology offers now a possibility to reduce the gap in accessibility of visual art to persons with blindness or low vision. The range of exhibits which are accessible needs no longer to be limited to sculpture. Paintings as well as objects which are too small (e.g. jewelry) or to large (e.g. buildings) to explore manually can be presented in a range of formats which totally blind persons can access – tactile graphics, “talking” tactile drawings and diagrams, 3-D models and audio-description. Samples of adaptations of exhibits which can be manually explored at 4 museums in Lublin receive highly positive feedback not only from persons with a visual impairment but also from sighted visitors who find tactile versions of paintings and 3-D models interesting (and educational at the same time). The micro project offers a chance not only to expand the range of adapter exhibits in Lublin but also to introduce the idea in Ivan-Frankivsk museums which have no provisions for persons with a visual impairment. Lublin (Poland) and Ivano-Frankivsk (Ukraine) are united by a twin city agreement. Relatively close distance and frequent coach service make travel between the cities easy. By addressing the challenge of increasing accessibility of cultural heritage to persons with a visual impairment the project will increase the potential of both cities as a tourists’ attraction and will make a major contribution to inclusion of persons with a disability of sight. The fact that neither Lublin nor Ivan-Frankivsk are the first choice as tourist destinations is in fact an advantage. With a mixture of Polish, Ukrainian and Jewish heritage. (English)
0 references
Identifiers
PLBU.01.01.00-06-0791/19
0 references